LD/SME check before submitting for review |
Course title and/or code, and assessment title are correct. (should now include version number requested and applied correctly) |
|
|
The Learning Outcomes are consistent with the Course Descriptor. |
|
|
The assessment weighting is consistent with the Course Descriptor. |
|
|
ASM Review |
Tasks are authentic - realistic to the working environment/context a graduate may find themselves in. |
|
|
The verbs used in the task/s reflect a pathway to achieving the Learning Outcomes. |
|
|
Task weighting and/or word count limit/guidance is appropriate for the volume of work required. |
|
|
Judgement statements reflect performance levels of the industry. |
|
|
Marking guidance evidence statements/suggested answers allow for a range of acceptable answers. |
|
|
LDD Review |
Assessment aligns with Summative assessment strategy/plan. |
|
|
Tasks can be completed, situated in learners' context. |
|
|
Assessment provides opportunities for choice. |
|
|
Marking schedule marks follow grade scale. |
|
|
Marks consistent between all learner-facing documents. |
|
|
Judgement statements clearly describe the performance level for each grade. |
|
|
Marking guidance has enough information for markers to make consistent marking decisions. |
|
|